Parallel computer architecture of a cellular type, modifiable and expandable

ABSTRACT

In this parallel computer processing is distributed among number of simple units with simple programs that consider only their immediate environment. Integration is achieved through multilayer architecture and a special three dimensional Memory Units. The whole system is expandable for more complex processing.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

[0001] Not Applicable

REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING

[0002] An attempt at writing a simulation computer program is being done by Mr. Leith Aboosi, American, presently teaching High School Math and Computer programming at The American School of Tangier, Tangier, Morocco.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] (01) Field of Invention

[0004] I have been teaching High School sciences, reading avidly on all sorts of topics, including computing, and got stimulated by the Chinese Book of Change (I Ching), but do not know of anything similar ever being attempted.

[0005] (02) Description of Prior Art

[0006] The following weak points of present day computers drew me toward trying to develop this new computer architecture:

[0007] 1) Inability of computers to process great amount of information simultaneously, therefore taking very long time to calculate through reiterations, thus limiting processing of information in time and great complexity of programming.

[0008] 2) Inability of computers to deal adequately with variability of the same input.

[0009] 3) Inability of computers in distinguishing figure from ground, except when actually programmed to look for a specific input.

[0010] 4) Inability of computers to associate previously non-related inputs that may have similarities in figure or background, except if programmed with a very elaborate lists, therefore not finding anything unexpected. That could be termed “lack of imagination”.

[0011] 5) I am a firm dualist in the phylosophical sense, and, even though I admire all the attepts at elucidation of our brain functioning, I am firmly convinced that “consciousness” can not be mechanized. Creating a computer architecture that could be used adequately in Artificial Intelligence could investigate and hopefully settle that question.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0012] This computer architecture uses localized “cells” for computation, where each cell reacts only to it's immediate environment. When cell groups are organized in Layers that are interconnected, so that higher levels can modify lower level computations, complex processing of information can be achieved by simple programs in each cell and the hardware architecture, that becomes a part of the programming.

[0013] Memory structure would be distributed in a three dimensional structure that would allow for associations of previously unrelated stimuli, recognition of variations of previous stimuli, creation of figure/ground divission, separation of figure from any specific ground, and allow for further comploexification of information processing through addition of additional levels.

[0014] This computer architecture would speed up processing, and eventually be able to reach decisions in real time.

[0015] This computer architecture would allow for investigation of many Artificial Intelligence and human concepts, like “feeling”, “intuition”, “imagination”, etc.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016]FIG. 1: Sensory Level, showing how the central hexagrams and their photoelectric cell would be distributed and help explain how it would be used to generate a number output. Color representation was necessary for visualization, which would otherwise be difficult to achieve. The same holds for all the other color drawings.

[0017]FIG. 2: Showing Level 2 a with it's receiving hexagrams.

[0018]FIG. 3:. Showing the overlap of Sensory Level by Level 2 a, in order to indicate the ease of connections between the two.

[0019]FIG. 4: Showing a spread of all 64 hexagrams, grouped in numbers with one, two, three, four, five and sex binary places activated, in order to explain the reasoning behind the type of processing mentioned in the detailed description.

[0020]FIG. 5: Showing an overlap of Level 2 a over the Sensory Level which would create a PATCH that would be fed to the Memory Unit.

[0021]FIG. 6: Showing the physical relation of Level 2 b to Sensory Level, clarifying how the central hexagram of that level would receive outputs of only blue color.

[0022]FIG. 7: Showing the physical relation of Level 2 g to Sensory Level, clarifying how the central hexagram of that level would receive outputs of only green color.

[0023]FIG. 8: Showing the physical relation of Level 2 r to Sensory Level, clarifying how the central hexagram of that level would receive outputs of only red color.

[0024]FIG. 9: Overlap of the last three levels over Sensory Level, clarifying their physical relation.

[0025]FIG. 10: Overlap of all Level 2 layers over Sensory Level, clarifying their physical relation.

[0026]FIG. 11: Three dimensional representation of front four octagons of one Memory Unit that would receive input from one Patch.

[0027]FIG. 12: Three dimensional representation of four back octagons of one Memory Unit that would receive input from one Patch.

[0028]FIG. 13: Three dimensional representation of a complete Memory Unit. That Memory Unit also shows the physical relationships of all 64 binary numbers and clarifies how the clock cycle wave could sweep through the structure to either reach the sink or create the “halograms”.

[0029]FIG. 14: Three dimensional representation of how Memory Units would fit together, showing only the X-Y plane. In fact each Memory unit could connect with 6 other memory units the same way that each Patch of Level 2 a would connect with 6 other patches that would cover completely the Sensory Level input.

[0030]FIG. 15: Three dimensional representation of Inner Octagons within the Memory Unit.

[0031]FIG. 16: Three dimensional representation of Outer Octagons within the Memory Unit.

[0032]FIG. 17: Three dimensional representation of both Inner and Outer Octagons within the Memory Unit. This would obviously exted to further attached Memory Units.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0033] This computer architecture starts with the Sensory Level (FIG. 1). The central hexagrams (blue, red or green) would be surrounded by photoelectric cells that would have an appropriate color filter in front of them. If a photoelectric cell received light, it would create a voltage gradient which would trigger an input to the appropriate binary place in the central hexagram. The voltage levels produced by the photoelectric cells would come in discrete steps, with a total of 7 levels of sensitivity. Each central hexagram would have the same sensitivity threshold to all of it's photoelectric cells at any one given time. The central hexagram would exhibit a number from 0 to 63, depending on which binary places were activated. Each number output from the central hexagram would represent a given shape, and the totality of the outputs of the Sensory Level would clearly convey the scene in front of it.

[0034] These outputs would be connected to Level 2 a (FIG. 2, and overlaped with Sensory Level FIG. 3), which would in it's own central hexagram contain seven binary positions, one for each of the six surrounding Sensory Level central hexagrams, and one for it's own central hexagram's receiving place (representing 64). Each binary position of level 2 a would represent presence of a number from the Sensory Level and the numbers position with respect to the Level 2 a central hexagram.

[0035] The numbers sent by the central hexagrams of the Sensory Level would be analyzed by Level 2 a's central hexagram's CPU. If a number was 0, CPU would convert it to 0 in the receiving position binary place; if the number was 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32, CPU would convert it to 1; if it was 3, 5, 9, 17, 33, 6, 10, 18, 34, 12, 20, 36, 24, 40 or 48, CPU would convert it to 2; for 7, 11, 19, 35, 13, 21, 37, 25, 41, 49, 14, 22, 38, 26, 42, 50, 28, 44, 52 or 56, CPU would convert it to 3; if the number was 15, 23, 39, 27, 43, 51, 29, 45, 53, 57, 30, 46, 54, 58 or 60, CPU would convert it to 4; if the number was 62, 61, 59, 55, 47 or 31, CPU would convert it to 5; and it was 63, CPU would: convert it to 6 (FIG. 4). The seven Sensory Level central hexagram converted numbers would be added and divided by 7. That number would represent average luminosity (brightness) of light at that patch of 7 central hexagrams of the Sensory Level (FIG. 5).

[0036] The result would be subtracted from each central hexagram's Sensory Level converted numbers. If the result was negative, the Sensory Level central hexagram would have it's sensitivity threshold to it's photoelectric cells decreased by the number difference during Level 2 a Output Mode. If the result was positive, the sensitivity threshold to it's photoelectric cells would be increased by the number difference. If the result was zero, the sensitivity threshold would not be changed. Them minimum sensitivity threshold level would be 1, and maximum 7. That would have an effect of lateral inhibition which emphasizes edges, adjusts to the strong lighting contitions, as well as weak lighting conditions.

[0037] The CPU of the central hexagram of Level 2 a would receive input from Sensory Level central hexagrams during one clock cycle in it's Input Mode. Then it would change from input mode to Analysis Mode turning off reading from the Sensory Level. In the analysis mode the CPU of the central hexagram of Level 2 a would convert inputs, do calculation with them and come out with a result, all that during a specific number of clock cycles. Then the CPU would switch to the Output Mode, adjusting the sensitivity thresholds in the Sensory Level central hexagrams, and sending the non-converted numbers (0 to 63) to the Level 3 a. The Sensory Level would change to receiving mode during Level 2 a Output Mode, followed by the next Input Mode.

[0038] Each number output from the central hexagram of the Sensory Level would also be connected to the slightly larger Level 2 b,g,r (blue, FIG. 6; green. FIG. 7; and red, FIG. 8; overlap othe the three layers, FIG. 9), where the central hexagram would also contain seven binary positions, and do the same calculation as in the Level. All the seven Sensory Level central hexagrams at these levels would be of the same color. The number output from 2 a would be subtracted from the number output of 2 b,g,r. If the answer was 0, it would represent absence of that color, therefore only having brightness (B/W); if the answer was positive it would represent the saturation of that color; and if negative, it would indicate saturation of the other two colors, therefore a positive number would be added to them, which would increase their saturation. Minimum saturation would be 1 and maximum 7. Those output numbers would indicate the average saturation of a given color at that point.

[0039] The outputs from Level 2 a,b,g,r (FIG. 10) would go to Level 3 a, identical in size and structure to the Sensory Level. Level 3 a's central hexagram's CPU would apply the calculated brightness and saturation to it's active binary cells (according to the patterns shown by 0 to 63 numbers), which would then be fed into digital color monitor. The digital monitor output could be storred in a video format for later slower processing by the operator. The recalled digital monitor output would permit the operator to click on Level 3 a output that he estimates contain important shape to remember, and that “frame” of activated cells would be the input to the memory storage, except for numbers 0 and 63 that would not be sent to Level 4. This would happen during Learning Mode of the system.

[0040] Memory storage would have a double system, distributed within Level 4 (of the same structure as the Sensory Level) and Level 5, one for short term memory and the other for long term memory.

[0041] The short term memory Level 4 would be able to accomodate a limited number of outputs from Level 3 a input, depending on the number of sequential Level 4 sets (suppose 15), where the Level 4 would store the first input provided by the operator and would place it to 4(15), and for second input to 4(14), etc. When the level 4(1) fills in, the set of 4(15) would be replaced by 4(14), etc., and 4(1) would receive the next input. Within the time limit of a pattern moving from 4(1) to 4(15) the operator would give feedback on what part of the pattern needs to be remembered clicking on the monitor output at the parts of the image that would be significant and that part of the pattern would be fed into Level 5 (many memory levels possible associated with each memory unit, where there would also be subdivisions of Level 5 memory in terms of what it was supposed to represent). The operator would choose the type of pattern by selecting from a list, and associating the name and an ID number with the pattern.

[0042] Such a pattern would be independent of location on the Sensory Level by being storred in hexagram cells representing different numbers, from 0 to 63 along with a binary position it had with respect to the central hexagram of the patch. Such pattern representations could be compared and shifted to any patch of Level 4 frames, and percent fit would be calculated. Level 5 hexagrams would be in a lattice like sturcture of trunkated octahedrons, where a patch of 7 Level 4 central hexagrams would feed into one unit of level 5 memory, so that that the appropriate relational positions of the numbers could be kept. The latice sturcture would have constant clock cycle activations through number 0 in the unit of Level 5 memory, and the binary places would send on impulses from each 0 location of a given number to the next hexagrams 1 location. In such a manner there would be constant waves of impulses going through memory hexagrams “dying” out at number 63 that would act as a “sink”. If such activation encountered input from Level 4, it would stop the progression from that 0 binary place and set the memory along with the name of the pattern and its ID. If a given number had an input into central place of the memory unit number (recognized as 64), that number would stop the progression of impulses from the number's 0 binary places and set the memory with the name and ID. The results of such an interaction would form two types of “halograms”, one for “figure” (fed in from Level 4), and one for “ground” (created through interaction with clock impulses). Each number hexagram would continue it's 0 to 1 progression only if all of it's 0 places had been activated by the clock impulses. The ground patterns would also be memorized and associated with the same name and ID.

[0043] Such patterns could be used as a basis for pattern recognition by being triggered directly from the level 4 (when in recognition mode). The patch patterns could be fed into memory units sequentially. The memory unit's central CPUs would pick up the patches of certain percent of matching (with figure or ground, and then adjust the rest of the memorized pattern under the same ID to it. If either of the two exhibited a certain percent of storred image (percentage modifiable by the operator), the pattern name would be displayed on the monitor, showing, the match of figure or ground by the increase of brightness, reversal of color or alike, as well as displaying the names of all possible pattern matches. The operator could then check the likeness of each pattern by clicking through the names. Such recognition mode could also be automatized and used as an active search tool. If the pattern did not reach a given percentage, the pattern would be discarded.

[0044] The memory in Level 5 (one memory unit in FIGS. 11, 12, 13, connected memory units in FIG. 14) would work in the following manner:

[0045] 1) When a pattern number from Level 4 hexagram patch is received by a number hexagram of Level 5, along with the position of the pattern the threshold to that position from the central number hexagram would increase by 1 (which would later be interpreted as more important). This number could be inhibited later by the operator, and would decrease the number by 1 each time. The lowest number would be 0. These thresholds would be memorized in the number hexagrams.

[0046] 2) To tie together all the inputs from a patch at a given time, the activated number hexagrams would activate the cell in the middle of the octagon (inner octagon cell, FIG. 15) by sending the ID number to it. The inner octagon cell would set the memory to such a number hexagram with the ID. Then it would send an impulse to the six surrounding inner octagon cells sending the same ID. If any one of those cells was activated, it would send the same ID back. Such an interaction would then be memorized in both inner octagon cells with the same ID. Such doing would tie all the active inner octagon cells over the whole field of Sensory Layer, all together representing the perceived pattern.

[0047] 3) Background active cells left from the 0 number wave would instead activate the outer octagon cells (FIG. 16), which would go through the same process, originating it's own clock ID, in order to tie the background together over the whole field. Such a background would not represent the Sensory Layer background, but the shape interferance background.

[0048] 4) Active inner octagon cells would send it's ID to surrounding outer octagon cells, which, if active, would send back it's own clock ID, and both would memorize the other's and one's own ID. All that would occur in the Learning Mode (FIG. 17).

[0049] 5) In Recognition Mode the Level 3 would send all the central hexagram numbers, except 0 and 63 to the Level 5 Memory Units, which would activate number hexagrams, which in turn would send impulses to inner octagon cells without any ID. The memorized ID connections between the number hexagram and the inner octagon would be sent to other inner octagons. If the same ID was received back, the connection would “lock”., and the same ID would be tried on other inner octagons memorized with the same ID. If all those memorized Ids are not “locked”, then it would try next memorized ID. If the inner octagon does “lock”, it would activate the number hexagons, and from there Level 3 and the output to digital monitor, exhibiting parts that were recognized with it's name and ID.

[0050] 6) Several IDs could be activated at the same time, therefore the whole list of names associated with recognition would be displayed on the side, with the % similarity. The operator could “lock on” a given pattern, and with it modify the memory, where only the active memory sites would be left, thus creating the essence of that pattern, storred with a new ID and name.

[0051] 7) Activated ID would also stimulate the Background in the memory through outer octagons associated with that ID. Background octagons would react in the same manner as inner octagons, and could then activate different clock ID associated with the activating inner octagon.

[0052] 8) Comparisons, unexpected connections, etc. could occur in such a system, leading to other areas of “thought” that would be combining patterns through translation, deformation, rotation, sizing and other ways.

[0053] In all levels CPUs would have two areas, one for a memory of a program and another for data execution memory. The levels above would be able to modify the programs on lower levels, therefore their functioning. All the information from each level (programs and data) would be accessible to display on a monitor.

[0054] The complexity of analysis and architecture of such a computer could increase with use and further developments. My belief is that such a new architecture could be used for creation and exploration of Artificial Intelligence, Visual analysis as well as later auditory or other “sense” synthesis (in memory like patterns), without being limited to a too close imitation of human nervious system, yet using the insights gathered from such a research.

[0055] The actual elaboration and building of such a computer would use many of the state of the art systems and processes. The programing of this computer would involve it's architecture as well as modification and elaboration of short central hexagram programs. All that, I believe, is new and original. 

What I claim as my invention is: 1) Unique Sensory Level disposition into Central Hexagrams and their surrounding photoelectric cells, labeled as binary positions. 2) Unique architecture of overlaps over Sensory Level permitting integration of information processing. 3) Unique architecture of Memory Units permitting integration of the whole Sensory field and separation of Figure and Ground. 4) Unique information processing procedures permitting extension and elaboration previously not achievable. 